The Spacetime Metric
Level 2 · Secondary physicsGrades 10–12About 9 hours

Special relativity without shortcuts

Use events, light cones, Lorentz transformations, and four-vectors quantitatively.

Move beyond slogans to the invariant interval, time dilation, length contraction, relativistic momentum, and causal structure.

Before you begin

  • Level 1 spacetime course
  • Mechanics
  • Algebra and square roots

By the end, you can

  • Calculate Lorentz factors and time dilation.
  • Use the invariant interval to classify event separation.
  • Relate energy and momentum relativistically.
  • Explain why local motion never exceeds c in a warp metric.

Interactive model

Explore before calculating

This comparison shows Newtonian gravity, not special relativity. Its arrows are acceleration directions outside spherical masses, not four-vectors or a drawing of the spacetime metric.

Gravity has no universal down

Imagine small test objects all around the masses. Each arrow shows the direction in which gravity changes an object’s motion, not the path it follows.

Mass arrangement
Gravity directions in three dimensionsDots mark sample positions. Arrows point along the net gravitational acceleration. The outlined dot is the selected sample. All non-zero arrows have the same length in 3D: they show direction only. Read the strength in the sample values. An arrow can look shorter when it points toward or away from your viewpoint.

Outside one spherical mass, gravity points toward its center from every direction.

All non-zero arrows have the same length in 3D: they show direction only. Read the strength in the sample values. An arrow can look shorter when it points toward or away from your viewpoint. Paler arrows are in the farther half of the scene; pale does not mean weaker gravity.

Viewpoint

These controls move your viewpoint. They do not move the masses or change the gravitational field.

Try it: where is down?

  1. Choose one mass. Predict where the arrows on its far side point, then turn the view to check. Look from above and below: do the arrows still point toward the mass?
  2. Choose two masses and turn the view again. Each arrow now combines both pulls; it need not point at either center. The smaller mass contributes too.

Did turning the view change gravity, or only how you see it?

Check your answer

Only your view changed. The masses and the pull at each point stayed the same. There is no bottom underneath the whole scene.

Selected sample · Scaled teaching units

x, y and z are scene coordinates, not universal up or down.

Position (x, y, z)
1.25; 0.02604; 0
Acceleration (x, y, z)
-2.559; -0.05333; 0
Strength
2.56

Masses in this snapshot

  • A: Mass 4; Radius 0.64; Center (0; 0; 0)
All sample values
The same sample positions and field values used by the diagram
SamplePosition (x, y, z)Acceleration (x, y, z)Strength
11.25; 0.02604; 0-2.559; -0.05333; 02.56
2-1.25; -0.02604; 02.559; 0.05333; 02.56
3-0.9199; 0.07813; 0.84271.884; -0.16; -1.7262.56
40.9199; -0.07813; -0.8427-1.884; 0.16; 1.7262.56
50.1087; 0.1302; -1.238-0.2226; -0.2667; 2.5362.56
6-0.1087; -0.1302; 1.2380.2226; 0.2667; -2.5362.56
70.7524; 0.1823; 0.9814-1.541; -0.3733; -2.012.56
8-0.7524; -0.1823; -0.98141.541; 0.3733; 2.012.56
9-1.209; 0.2344; -0.21392.476; -0.48; 0.4382.56
101.209; -0.2344; 0.2139-2.476; 0.48; -0.4382.56
111.027; 0.2865; -0.6531-2.103; -0.5867; 1.3372.56
12-1.027; -0.2865; 0.65312.103; 0.5867; -1.3372.56
13-0.3124; 0.3385; 1.1620.6397; -0.6933; -2.382.56
140.3124; -0.3385; -1.162-0.6397; 0.6933; 2.382.56
15-0.5473; 0.3906; -1.0541.121; -0.8; 2.1582.56
160.5473; -0.3906; 1.054-1.121; 0.8; -2.1582.56
171.098; 0.4427; 0.401-2.249; -0.9067; -0.82132.56
18-1.098; -0.4427; -0.4012.249; 0.9067; 0.82132.56
19-1.061; 0.4948; 0.4382.173; -1.013; -0.8972.56
201.061; -0.4948; -0.438-2.173; 1.013; 0.8972.56
210.4764; 0.5469; -1.018-0.9757; -1.12; 2.0852.56
22-0.4764; -0.5469; 1.0180.9757; 1.12; -2.0852.56
230.3284; 0.599; 1.047-0.6725; -1.227; -2.1442.56
24-0.3284; -0.599; -1.0470.6725; 1.227; 2.1442.56
25-0.9232; 0.651; -0.5351.891; -1.333; 1.0962.56
260.9232; -0.651; 0.535-1.891; 1.333; -1.0962.56
271.009; 0.7031; -0.2219-2.067; -1.44; 0.45452.56
28-1.009; -0.7031; 0.22192.067; 1.44; -0.45452.56
29-0.5729; 0.7552; 0.81481.173; -1.547; -1.6692.56
300.5729; -0.7552; -0.8148-1.173; 1.547; 1.6692.56
31-0.1226; 0.8073; -0.94640.2512; -1.653; 1.9382.56
320.1226; -0.8073; 0.9464-0.2512; 1.653; -1.9382.56
330.6941; 0.8594; 0.585-1.422; -1.76; -1.1982.56
34-0.6941; -0.8594; -0.5851.422; 1.76; 1.1982.56
35-0.8547; 0.9115; 0.035341.75; -1.867; -0.072382.56
360.8547; -0.9115; -0.03534-1.75; 1.867; 0.072382.56
370.5644; 0.9635; -0.5617-1.156; -1.973; 1.152.56
38-0.5644; -0.9635; 0.56171.156; 1.973; -1.152.56
39-0.03366; 1.016; 0.72790.06894; -2.08; -1.4912.56
400.03366; -1.016; -0.7279-0.06894; 2.08; 1.4912.56
41-0.4165; 1.068; -0.49910.8529; -2.187; 1.0222.56
420.4165; -1.068; 0.4991-0.8529; 2.187; -1.0222.56
430.5505; 1.12; 0.07407-1.127; -2.293; -0.15172.56
44-0.5505; -1.12; -0.074071.127; 2.293; 0.15172.56
45-0.3571; 1.172; 0.24840.7313; -2.4; -0.50882.56
460.3571; -1.172; -0.2484-0.7313; 2.4; 0.50882.56
470.05571; 1.224; -0.2476-0.1141; -2.507; 0.50722.56
48-0.05571; -1.224; 0.24760.1141; 2.507; -0.50722.56
492.05; 0.04271; 0-0.9516; -0.01983; 00.9518
50-2.05; -0.04271; 00.9516; 0.01983; 00.9518
51-1.509; 0.1281; 1.3820.7005; -0.05949; -0.64170.9518
521.509; -0.1281; -1.382-0.7005; 0.05949; 0.64170.9518
530.1782; 0.2135; -2.031-0.08276; -0.09915; 0.9430.9518
54-0.1782; -0.2135; 2.0310.08276; 0.09915; -0.9430.9518
551.234; 0.299; 1.609-0.5729; -0.1388; -0.74730.9518
56-1.234; -0.299; -1.6090.5729; 0.1388; 0.74730.9518
57-1.983; 0.3844; -0.35070.9206; -0.1785; 0.16280.9518
581.983; -0.3844; 0.3507-0.9206; 0.1785; -0.16280.9518
591.684; 0.4698; -1.071-0.7817; -0.2181; 0.49730.9518
60-1.684; -0.4698; 1.0710.7817; 0.2181; -0.49730.9518
61-0.5123; 0.5552; 1.9060.2379; -0.2578; -0.88480.9518
620.5123; -0.5552; -1.906-0.2379; 0.2578; 0.88480.9518
63-0.8975; 0.6406; -1.7280.4167; -0.2974; 0.80240.9518
640.8975; -0.6406; 1.728-0.4167; 0.2974; -0.80240.9518
651.801; 0.726; 0.6576-0.8361; -0.3371; -0.30530.9518
66-1.801; -0.726; -0.65760.8361; 0.3371; 0.30530.9518
67-1.74; 0.8115; 0.71830.8079; -0.3768; -0.33350.9518
681.74; -0.8115; -0.7183-0.8079; 0.3768; 0.33350.9518
690.7813; 0.8969; -1.67-0.3628; -0.4164; 0.77520.9518
70-0.7813; -0.8969; 1.670.3628; 0.4164; -0.77520.9518
710.5385; 0.9823; 1.717-0.25; -0.4561; -0.79710.9518
72-0.5385; -0.9823; -1.7170.25; 0.4561; 0.79710.9518
73-1.514; 1.068; -0.87750.703; -0.4957; 0.40740.9518
741.514; -1.068; 0.8775-0.703; 0.4957; -0.40740.9518
751.655; 1.153; -0.3639-0.7686; -0.5354; 0.1690.9518
76-1.655; -1.153; 0.36390.7686; 0.5354; -0.1690.9518
77-0.9395; 1.239; 1.3360.4362; -0.5751; -0.62050.9518
780.9395; -1.239; -1.336-0.4362; 0.5751; 0.62050.9518
79-0.2011; 1.324; -1.5520.09339; -0.6147; 0.72070.9518
800.2011; -1.324; 1.552-0.09339; 0.6147; -0.72070.9518
811.138; 1.409; 0.9594-0.5285; -0.6544; -0.44540.9518
82-1.138; -1.409; -0.95940.5285; 0.6544; 0.44540.9518
83-1.402; 1.495; 0.057960.6508; -0.694; -0.026910.9518
841.402; -1.495; -0.05796-0.6508; 0.694; 0.026910.9518
850.9257; 1.58; -0.9212-0.4298; -0.7337; 0.42770.9518
86-0.9257; -1.58; 0.92120.4298; 0.7337; -0.42770.9518
87-0.0552; 1.666; 1.1940.02563; -0.7733; -0.55430.9518
880.0552; -1.666; -1.194-0.02563; 0.7733; 0.55430.9518
89-0.683; 1.751; -0.81850.3171; -0.813; 0.380.9518
900.683; -1.751; 0.8185-0.3171; 0.813; -0.380.9518
910.9029; 1.836; 0.1215-0.4192; -0.8527; -0.05640.9518
92-0.9029; -1.836; -0.12150.4192; 0.8527; 0.05640.9518
93-0.5856; 1.922; 0.40740.2719; -0.8923; -0.18920.9518
940.5856; -1.922; -0.4074-0.2719; 0.8923; 0.18920.9518
950.09136; 2.007; -0.4061-0.04242; -0.932; 0.18860.9518
96-0.09136; -2.007; 0.40610.04242; 0.932; -0.18860.9518

This Newtonian snapshot assumes each body's mass is distributed the same way in every direction from its center. It shows only the exterior field, not spacetime curvature. The bodies stay fixed; their motion is not simulated.

Live laboratory

Light-cone event classifier

Move a second event in space and time. The invariant interval—not an observer's drawing alone—classifies their causal relationship.

ctx

timelike: Δs² = 8.94 km². A slower-than-light signal could connect the events, and their time order is invariant.

Level 2 · Secondary physics teaching kit

Record the investigation. Teach the reasoning.

A learner-facing lab record and a course-specific instructor guide turn the live model into a repeatable classroom investigation.

Learner record

Light-cone interval and causality atlas

Which event pairs can exchange a signal, and which descriptions remain invariant when coordinates change?

Download learner record

Instructor guide

Teach for evidence, not button pushing

Learners classify event separation from the invariant interval and distinguish coordinates from causal structure.

Download instructor guide
Open the complete print-friendly teaching kit →

Lesson 1 of 3

Lorentz factor and moving clocks

How much proper time accumulates along different inertial paths?

The Lorentz factor γ = 1/√(1−v²/c²) quantifies how strongly space and time coordinates mix. At everyday speed γ is almost one.

Proper time is what a clock records along its own path. Between the same departure and reunion events, different paths can accumulate different proper times.

Lorentz factorproper timetime dilationworldline

Worked example

A spacecraft moves at 0.80c. Find γ.

  1. 1. Compute v²/c² = 0.64.
  2. 2. Compute √(1−0.64) = 0.60.
  3. 3. Take the reciprocal.

γ ≈ 1.67; 1.0 ship-year spans about 1.67 years in the chosen Earth frame.

Try it

Lorentz-factor table

Materials: Calculator and spreadsheet or graph paper.

  1. 1. Compute γ at 0, 0.1c, 0.5c, 0.8c, 0.95c, and 0.99c.
  2. 2. Plot γ versus v/c.
  3. 3. Identify the nonlinear region.
  4. 4. Explain why no finite γ reaches c.

Notice: Relativistic effects grow sharply near c rather than linearly with speed.

Check your understanding: Does time dilation mean one observer's clock mechanism is defective?

Answer: No.

Each local clock runs normally; elapsed time depends on the spacetime path between compared events.

Lesson 2 of 3

Invariant intervals and light cones

Which events can influence one another?

The interval combines temporal and spatial separation in a quantity all inertial observers agree on. Timelike-separated events can be connected by slower-than-light motion; lightlike events by light; spacelike events cannot be causally linked without superluminal influence.

Observers may disagree on the time order of spacelike events, but they agree on the causal classification.

timelikelightlikespacelikecausality

Worked example

Two events are 5 light-seconds apart in space and 3 seconds apart in time.

  1. 1. Light could cross only 3 light-seconds in 3 seconds.
  2. 2. Spatial separation exceeds cΔt.
  3. 3. Classify the interval as spacelike.

No signal traveling at or below c can connect the events in that frame, and all inertial observers agree they are spacelike.

Try it

Draw a light-cone map

Materials: Graph paper with ct vertical and x horizontal.

  1. 1. Draw 45° light rays from an event.
  2. 2. Place timelike, lightlike, and spacelike examples.
  3. 3. Draw a slower observer worldline.
  4. 4. Test which points can receive a signal.

Notice: The cone is a causal boundary, not a physical shell traveling through space.

Check your understanding: Can two inertial observers disagree about whether two events are spacelike?

Answer: No.

The interval classification is invariant even when coordinate differences change.

Lesson 3 of 3

Relativistic energy and momentum

What replaces classical kinetic-energy formulas near light speed?

Relativistic momentum p = γmv grows without bound as a massive object approaches c. Total energy and momentum obey E² = (pc)² + (mc²)².

Light has zero rest mass but nonzero energy and momentum. A warp spacetime proposal changes geometry rather than accelerating a local craft through c.

rest energyrelativistic momentumfour-momentummassless particle

Worked example

Find the total energy of a 1 kg object at 0.80c in units of its rest energy.

  1. 1. Use E = γmc².
  2. 2. At 0.80c, γ ≈ 1.67.
  3. 3. Divide by mc².

Total energy is about 1.67 times rest energy; kinetic energy is about 0.67mc².

Try it

Classical-versus-relativistic comparison

Materials: Calculator or spreadsheet.

  1. 1. Compute classical ½mv² and relativistic (γ−1)mc² at several v/c values.
  2. 2. Normalize both by mc².
  3. 3. Plot the difference.
  4. 4. Mark where classical error exceeds 1%.

Notice: Classical mechanics is an excellent low-speed approximation and fails progressively near c.

Check your understanding: Why can light carry momentum without rest mass?

Answer: For m = 0, the energy-momentum relation becomes E = pc.

Rest mass is not required for relativistic momentum.

Formula-to-meaning deck

Read the equation in ordinary language.

γ = 1/√(1−v²/c²)

Lorentz factor measures relativistic mixing at speed v.

Units: dimensionless

Δs² = c²Δt² − Δx²

The spacetime interval is invariant between inertial frames.

Units:

E² = (pc)² + (mc²)²

Energy, momentum, and rest mass form one relativistic relation.

Units:

Independent practice

Problem set

Work each problem before opening its hint and solution.

  1. 1. Find γ at 0.60c.

    Reveal hint

    Compute 1/√(1−0.36).

    Reveal solution

    γ = 1.25.

  2. 2. A muon experiences 2.2 μs while moving with γ = 10. What lifetime is measured in the lab frame?

    Reveal hint

    Δt = γΔτ.

    Reveal solution

    22 μs.

  3. 3. A photon has energy 3.0 eV. Express its momentum symbolically.

    Reveal hint

    Set m = 0 in the energy-momentum relation.

    Reveal solution

    p = E/c = 3.0 eV/c.

Continue into the evidence